News

Raging Bull Supreme Court Decision

May 30, 2014

Glen Kulik represented the appellant before the United States Supreme Court in Petrella vs. MGM, which resulted in a a reversal in favor of the firm’s client in a copyright infringement case that many experts have heralded as one of the most significant copyright decisions in the past 50 years. Ms. Petrella’s father wrote the […]

Court of Appeal Decision

August 2, 2013
,

On June 19, 2013, Len Siegel, Tom Ware, and David Bernardoni secured a Court of Appeal decision upholding the trial court’s sustaining of a homeowner association’s demurrer to homeowners’ complaint seeking to hold the Association liable for in excess of $200,000 in damages arising out of engineering errors in the homeowners’ architectural application. The victory […]

California Supreme Court Articulates the Mixed Motive Defense for Employers

July 26, 2013

In the recent case of Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal.4th 203 (2013), the California Supreme Court clarified the “mixed motive defense” that employers frequently use in litigation. The mixed motive defense generally applies where, although the plaintiff has shown an employer’s intentional discrimination, the employer has also proved it would have made […]

Who qualifies as a supervisor in cases where an employee sues for workplace harassment?

June 27, 2013

How the Supreme Court’s Latest Decision Affects Employers and Employees For companies that employ 15 or more employees beware: Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act gives employees the right to sue if they suffer workplace discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or gender identity. This past week, the U.S. Supreme […]

Court Holds Homeowners Association May Exclude A Member’s Representative From Board Meetings

June 25, 2013

A new opinion published on June 20, 2013, holds that a homeowners association may exclude an owner’s representative from a board meeting because the representative was not “member” as defined by the association’s governing documents. In SB Liberty, LLC v. Isle Verde Association, Inc., the homeowner formed a limited liability company (“SB Liberty”) to hold […]

Ninth Circuit Decides A Copyright Troll Has No Standing to Sue

June 25, 2013
,

“Trolls,” or intellectual property assertion entities, refer to business entities that purchase I.P. portfolios and file infringement lawsuits. Many are familiar with this concept in the patent context, but few recognize there are also assertion entities that purchase copyright assignments. In a recent Ninth Circuit case, Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2013 WL 1908876, the panel […]

Scroll to Top